Gail Manishor writes:

This sounds like it will be very helpful.
thank you.
Gail Manishor

[Reply]

MathMojo writes:

Man, this is a great Idea! Glad you guys got around to it. I am looking forward to the next 100 day challenge using this. It’s gonna’ make submissions and corrections much less frustrating.

Thanks for doing this!

[Reply]

Kitty Jellinek writes:

Great Idea!
Thanks,
Kitty.

[Reply]

Cathy Chapman writes:

Thank you! This will be of tremendous help.

Last challenge I submitted a boat load of articles on a particular topic. There must have been a couple of reviewers. I wasn’t sure of what would be accepted. When the first ones were accepted, I wrote the rest the same way. They were rejected. I had no idea why.

I kept tinkering with the one’s being rejected and they continued to be rejected. I was pulling my hair out.

When I finally got a response … it was during challenge time and they had a lot to do … the one’s that were accepted before, according to this reviewer shouldn’t have been. So, I had been going to erroneous information.

Knowing the problem immediately would have been a huge help.

Again, Thank you!

[Reply]

Juli Woods writes:

Thanks – this is a great idea. Much easier for all of us – we’ll have a better idea of what we did wrong and you’ll have less to wade through from the rewrites.

[Reply]

nellore writes:

It’s helpful to every author. I like this.

[Reply]

R MacKenzie writes:

Sounds like a great feature to me. Even after several articles we all miss things now and again, and this will make corrections much more efficient. Thanks!

[Reply]

Rusty writes:

This is awesome. I hope my entire article is not high lighted. :)

[Reply]

Lance Winslow writes:

THIS IS GREAT! Plus, even if you cannont highlight mulitple paragraphs, the author can review the rest for similar problems and fix it. This is a great innovation and positive evolution for the article marketing specialist user. Thank you very much, I think this is wonderful.

[Reply]

David Barth writes:

I felt so dense when I received four “problem” emails and could not solve what was wrong. This will be very helpful. Thank you.

[Reply]

sreekumar writes:

ANOTHER GEM added to your crown. This was exactly what was expected from you since it will save a lot of time.

[Reply]

malaysia writes:

Yes. This is helpful to us and save a lot of our time. Thanks.

[Reply]

download free new movies writes:

Good idea bro.Highlighting the areas of mistakes in articles allows both author and reviewers to be benefited.but its better to remove some silly mistakes by yourself rather than emailing them through highlighted portion.because mistakes are human tendency.

[Reply]

dory writes:

This sounds great should help out heaps when it comes to editing for review again. Anything that makes life that little bit easier gets the thumbs up from me!

[Reply]

Maria Kako writes:

This is a very good idea.

Thank you

Maria

[Reply]

rachel writes:

What a great idea! I would suggest adding a little footnote at the end of the highlighted sentence.

The footnote would refer to theparticular section in the editorial guidelines where the problem is referenced.

[Reply]

Penny, Managing Editor writes:

Rachel,

In the email, aside from the highlighted section, we do reference the editorial guideline the problematic area interferes with. We link right to the guideline for easy access and reference. :)

October 12, 2010 at 9:34 AM

[Reply]

Paula writes:

I think this is a great idea. I spent a lot of time re-writing the wrong bit of an article because the standard comment couldn’t make it clear which bit was wrong. Ithink this will be very helpful.

[Reply]

t8 writes:

Great. I was expeting this from a long time ago. Thanks.

[Reply]

jon bone writes:

Yes at last, my spelling sometimes can go bad especially when I’m tired, this sorts that out and with the new auto save function, well, no more big mistakes are going to happen really. Thanks !

October 14, 2010 at 6:35 AM

[Reply]

Trish writes:

This will be great and will really speed things up. I submitted an article a week ago and was notified yesterday that it had been rejected.
In the email I was told I had to contact support to find out the reason.
If this new system had been in place I would have known immediately what the problem was, without having to wait another few days,

BRILLIANT IDEA!

[Reply]

ucuz al writes:

It is so helpfull, Thanks

[Reply]

Joseph D Shiller writes:

You guys read my mind! Fantastic customer service evolution! Love the new blog design too.

[Reply]

Dan Murphy writes:

This is great. This is a great feature. It will make things much easier for authors. Thanks.

[Reply]

Umraz writes:

Great!!!

[Reply]

Rusty writes:

I just got an article rejected. Said the body doesn’t deliver on the title. That’s absurd.

It also says there are spelling errors, I can’t spell so i believe it. But, no highlighted.

Can’t highlight a misspelling?

Oh well, I know where to put the article.

[Reply]

Penny, Managing Editor writes:

Rusty,

A team member of the Member support team will be emailing you privately on this issue.

October 13, 2010 at 12:46 PM

[Reply]

Outerwear Fashion Guru writes:

I have been noticing that the turn around time for article approval are faster (when there’s no errors).

Is this a coincidence?

Cheers

[Reply]

Outerwear Fashion Guru writes:

I noticed that acceptance rate is faster. Especially when there are no errors. Is this a coincidence?

[Reply]

Penny, Managing Editor writes:

Outerwear Fashion Guru,

The less errors you have in your articles, the faster we are in our article reviews.

October 18, 2010 at 10:33 AM

[Reply]

Joyce writes:

How many articles can i submit per day?

[Reply]

Penny, Managing Editor writes:

Joyce,

You can submit as many as your membership level will allow you:

Basic = 10 Submissions
Basic Plus = 25 Submissions
Platinum = Unlimited

The first 2 membership levels require an account review/upgrade once the submissions have been used. We will review your account for an upgrade within 12 business hours once you have depleted all of your submissions. So to answer your question, you can submit as many as you want per day providing you have the submissions allotted to you.

October 18, 2010 at 10:32 AM

[Reply]