|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
From My Desk to Yours – 4th EditionRate This Post:
By: Penny, EzineArticles Managing Editor Question: How do I crank up the word count in my articles without adding fluff, yet still deliver NEW quality content that will capture my audience? Hmmm, seems like an easy enough question. This challenge arises when you have already delivered as much as you feel you can and your articles are starting to sound like your grandfather’s favorite old story. Over and over, the same words are flowing and you’re trying like crazy to offer something new in your market. So what do you do? Answers:
Remember, writing is not easy and article marketing is not a fast process. To succeed, you will need to invest time in researching your topic and your market’s needs. The good news is that time changes everything – so there is always something new to write about. 4 Things to Avoid:
Here are a few other blog posts to help you find inspiration for fresh, content-rich articles:
This is by no means an exhaustive essay on how to generate a high number of longer fresh, original articles. If you have other thoughts and ideas on the subject, we’d love to hear about them. So please leave a comment.
11 Comments »1
2
3
This point stuck out to me: “[Avoid] say[ing] the same thing, only using different words or rearranging those words.” I remember one prolific author on EzineArticles who used to submit 3 articles for every 1 topic he wrote about it. Each article was just a variation. He found he got more traffic that way. Anyway, I agree: It’s not really helpful to the reader… although it might be helpful for the writer. Ryan [Reply] Comment provided November 4, 2009 at 5:36 PM
4
Interesting piece. I am still relatively new and learning a lot. I did one of those 4 things to avoid recently! (but I am not telling) Here is one thing I have found: when i write from what I know or have experienced, content generation is easier. Keep up the great work educating. I have had more training from EzineArticles than any other article directories I have signed up for. [Reply] Comment provided November 4, 2009 at 8:42 PM
5
6
Enjoyed reading this post and followed the links to other blog posts. Great inspiration. Thanks. I also get really turned off by people submitting masses of variations on a theme with just a few words altered each time, which they call articles. It’s great you’re keeping on top of that. [Reply] Comment provided November 5, 2009 at 6:42 AM
7
Dear Penny, My pet peeve, and I’m sure a lot of other very busy people – who don’t have much time to read repetition or uninteresting articles – will agree with me, that sometimes less is more and it’s the quality, not the quantity that counts. [Reply] Comment provided November 5, 2009 at 9:05 AM
8
Update More words = less clicks to your links More words = more readers leaving after clicking adsense ads think about it [Reply] You found this out how? How many articles over what time period? Beginning vs. ending time period? Impact of CTR: Word count before vs. word count after? Resource box the same in both cases? Please show us the articles or the article ID’s so we can review your research. November 10, 2009 at 11:44 AM[Reply] Comment provided November 10, 2009 at 7:52 AM
9
That is a good update but Chris is write by asking those good questions. A specific and full research must be done to confirm the assumptions :) I do agree that having too much words like 500 hundred or more may border the reader. But it depends on who is reading it :) Thanks for the advise by the way Penny =) [Reply] Comment provided November 11, 2009 at 1:34 PM
|
|
||||||||||||||
BLOG COMMENT POLICY |
|||||||||||||||
just found this site by a sort of synchronistic ‘accident’-after previously happening upon th idea of writing articles as a way of extending one’s field (why didn’t i think of that before?) And possibly wouldn’t have thought of ‘askin questions’ on forums etc as a way of gathering inspiration-seems so obvious now!The Socratic Method meets Google,how cool is that!-very Information Age!
November 5, 2009 at 5:37 AM[Reply]