I sent you a private email to help this issue along.

-Chris

The keyword phrases are:

anti aging skin care review
anti aging skin care system

Yet I am being told the offending phrase for key term abuse is anti aging skin care.
This is anot one of the key terms but part of both key terms phrases.

Thanks ezine!!

Title: Grysczk Gloves.
H1: Grysczk Gloves for the working man
Body: Grysczk Gloves are the glove of the working man, the real man. The Working man knows that his Grysczk Gloves will last him years because Grysczk Gloves….

Painful.
I actually read the text just to see if there was any real value beyond keyword saturation, and the article would not have been bad if written without his keyword so heavy.

The writer had a keyword saturation Grysczk Gloves in 100% of the paragraphs, greater than 75% of the sentences and overall - probably over 20% saturation.

Like I said. Painful.

By submitting only original content you might feel better about your article and you will not have to use key-words too often. (I am still not clear on specifically what keywords you are speaking of).

Hope that helps. If not, sorry about that. Just one opinion here.

Interesting tool.

If an author uses synonyms he or she can have better results, besides being able to repeat the basic many times with different words.

I recommend what I’ve already recommended earlier in this thread: That you forget about all of this keyword and keyphrase density issue.

Just focus on producing quality original content.

If you want to obsess over any key element of the article writing/marketing process: Expand your article TITLE to longer than feels comfortable and test that.

I’m a newbie - and my web coach was pretty specific about the website content keyword inclusion - but never made a big point of it on article submissions.

Just for the record - what would be an ‘ideal’ number of repetitions for any given keyword in a solid article?

I struggle enough with the website content recommendation of 10, while still making the content blatantly obvious of the fact. There’s a trick to it, that’s for sure.

Good question and I was wondering how long it would take before someone asked it.

No, we won’t be providing this tool [before the article is submitted] because we fear it will lead to the very thing we’re trying to prevent.

The articles that I have been reading (and saving in my “learning bank”) have been extremely helpful. Thanks!

Does having access to this tool mean it is something we can do before we submit or does it mean that if an article is “soft-rejected” that our email will be similar to the example?