Comments on: Problem Articles 30 Day Purge Rule http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/problem-articles-30-day-purge-rule.html Fri, 10 Oct 2008 23:46:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 by: anson http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/problem-articles-30-day-purge-rule.html#comment-12768 Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:50:11 +0000 http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/problem-articles-30-day-purge-rule.html#comment-12768 i think this is necessary i think this is necessary

]]> by: Christopher M. Knight http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/problem-articles-30-day-purge-rule.html#comment-12564 Wed, 05 Dec 2007 02:05:29 +0000 http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/problem-articles-30-day-purge-rule.html#comment-12564 Nice Angie! http://www.networkmarketinginternethomebusiness.com/blog/2007/12/internet-and-network-marketing-success.html :) Nice Angie!
http://www.networkmarketinginternethomebusiness.com/blog/2007/12/internet-and-network-marketing-success.html

:)

]]> by: Angela Chen Shui http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/problem-articles-30-day-purge-rule.html#comment-12555 Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:02:47 +0000 http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/problem-articles-30-day-purge-rule.html#comment-12555 Thanks for the push, Chris. One happy result of this post is that I finally finished editing a problem article awhile ago... ;-) Thanks for the push, Chris. One happy result of this post is that I finally finished editing a problem article awhile ago… ;-)

]]> by: Lance Winslow http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/problem-articles-30-day-purge-rule.html#comment-12543 Sat, 01 Dec 2007 12:29:41 +0000 http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/problem-articles-30-day-purge-rule.html#comment-12543 Well, I am proud to be part of the greatest Online Articles Site, ever created in the history of humankind. Others should be too and take responsibility and fix their articles, as that is a fair for all concerned; the reader, Ezine Articles Community and themselves. And that is my $ .02 on this issue Well, I am proud to be part of the greatest Online Articles Site, ever created in the history of humankind. Others should be too and take responsibility and fix their articles, as that is a fair for all concerned; the reader, Ezine Articles Community and themselves. And that is my $ .02 on this issue

]]> by: Michelle L Devon (Michy) http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/problem-articles-30-day-purge-rule.html#comment-12539 Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:37:40 +0000 http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/problem-articles-30-day-purge-rule.html#comment-12539 More than fair, and totally necessary - good move. Love and stuff, Michy More than fair, and totally necessary - good move.

Love and stuff,
Michy

]]> by: Christina Sponias http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/problem-articles-30-day-purge-rule.html#comment-12538 Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:43:38 +0000 http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/problem-articles-30-day-purge-rule.html#comment-12538 Yes Chris, your own group of affiliate revisers will solve many problems at EA: - The problematic articles will be fixed by them - The foreigners (like me) will prefer your revisers instead of searching for them in the vast web - Whenever an author will need advice or help in writing an article, he or she will go directly to your revisers You can also have a group of ghostwriters for those that can only make a list of benefits or whatever and let somebody else transform the information given in article. You can make money with the commissions for giving so much work to many revisers and ghostwriters! You won’t lose authors that have difficulties writing, you won’t waste material that needs improvement and you won’t need to reject many times an article after several corrections because it will be directly corrected by the experts that know very well your rules. Yes Chris, your own group of affiliate revisers will solve many problems at EA:

- The problematic articles will be fixed by them
- The foreigners (like me) will prefer your revisers instead of searching for them in the vast web
- Whenever an author will need advice or help in writing an article, he or she will go directly to your revisers

You can also have a group of ghostwriters for those that can only make a list of benefits or whatever and let somebody else transform the information given in article.

You can make money with the commissions for giving so much work to many revisers and ghostwriters!
You won’t lose authors that have difficulties writing, you won’t waste material that needs improvement and you won’t need to reject many times an article after several corrections because it will be directly corrected by the experts that know very well your rules.

]]> by: Christopher M. Knight http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/problem-articles-30-day-purge-rule.html#comment-12537 Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:01:22 +0000 http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/problem-articles-30-day-purge-rule.html#comment-12537 Interesting... will consider or perhaps make this part of our proofreading service yet to be announced. Interesting… will consider or perhaps make this part of our proofreading service yet to be announced.

]]> by: Christina Sponias http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/problem-articles-30-day-purge-rule.html#comment-12536 Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:52:03 +0000 http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/problem-articles-30-day-purge-rule.html#comment-12536 Hi Chris! I would suggest revisers. Why don’t you tell to all members that have problematic articles to send their articles to several revisers that would correct them for them? They would have to pay for the revision but this service would be cheap. You have to have a group of revisers for these cases, revisers that know very well what EA can accept and that will be able to correct all the problematic articles in order to help the authors and in order to help EA save all the material that is being wasted. The revisers don’t need to work with you in your office. They can work at home but be part of your team and have their own deal with the authors, independently of EA. They only need to know how to save the problematic articles according to your rules. Hi Chris!

I would suggest revisers. Why don’t you tell to all members that have problematic articles to send their articles to several revisers that would correct them for them? They would have to pay for the revision but this service would be cheap.

You have to have a group of revisers for these cases, revisers that know very well what EA can accept and that will be able to correct all the problematic articles in order to help the authors and in order to help EA save all the material that is being wasted.

The revisers don’t need to work with you in your office. They can work at home but be part of your team and have their own deal with the authors, independently of EA. They only need to know how to save the problematic articles according to your rules.

]]> by: Chinmay Chakravarty http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/problem-articles-30-day-purge-rule.html#comment-12535 Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:10:41 +0000 http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/problem-articles-30-day-purge-rule.html#comment-12535 No problems, Chris. This is perfectly logical and necessary. Only reqirement is that the 'problem' need to be specified a little more clearly. This way the burden of explaining on both sides is likely to be erased. Serious 'problem' articles may be rejected outright which is advantageous to both editors and writers. Personal attention can be given to outstanding articles with minor problems. No problems, Chris. This is perfectly logical and necessary. Only reqirement is that the ‘problem’ need to be specified a little more clearly. This way the burden of explaining on both sides is likely to be erased. Serious ‘problem’ articles may be rejected outright which is advantageous to both editors and writers. Personal attention can be given to outstanding articles with minor problems.

]]> by: Hope Wilbanks @ HopeWrites.com http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/problem-articles-30-day-purge-rule.html#comment-12534 Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:57:13 +0000 http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/problem-articles-30-day-purge-rule.html#comment-12534 I think this is an excellent idea, Chris. I think this is an excellent idea, Chris.

]]>