<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deleted Articles Now Used To Compare</title>
	<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/deleted-articles-now-used-to-compare.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: anson</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/deleted-articles-now-used-to-compare.html#comment-12764</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/deleted-articles-now-used-to-compare.html#comment-12764</guid>
					<description>yes, sometime we will submit the article again, is great for us can check that duplicate article</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, sometime we will submit the article again, is great for us can check that duplicate article<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Carl Pruitt</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/deleted-articles-now-used-to-compare.html#comment-12551</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 21:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/deleted-articles-now-used-to-compare.html#comment-12551</guid>
					<description>We all truly appreciate all the effort you and your staff go to in order to maintain the reputation of this valuable resource!

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all truly appreciate all the effort you and your staff go to in order to maintain the reputation of this valuable resource!</p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Christopher M. Knight</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/deleted-articles-now-used-to-compare.html#comment-12550</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 21:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/deleted-articles-now-used-to-compare.html#comment-12550</guid>
					<description>This new rule has emails coming into us that say something like:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Hi, I recently decided to delete some of my articles and then edit them, but when I try to submit them again,

I get the message that they're duplicate!

I though that they already had been deleted and removed from Ezinearticles?

Please help and clarify.
Thank you&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Tells me that we should update the error message to explain what just happened and why... 

We are updating the rule to allow re-submission of articles that were never made live...as this rule was designed to prevent 'gaming' but not impact authors who deleted an article that was never made live.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This new rule has emails coming into us that say something like:</p>
<blockquote><p>Hi, I recently decided to delete some of my articles and then edit them, but when I try to submit them again,</p>
<p>I get the message that they&#8217;re duplicate!</p>
<p>I though that they already had been deleted and removed from Ezinearticles?</p>
<p>Please help and clarify.<br />
Thank you</p></blockquote>
<p>Tells me that we should update the error message to explain what just happened and why&#8230; </p>
<p>We are updating the rule to allow re-submission of articles that were never made live&#8230;as this rule was designed to prevent &#8216;gaming&#8217; but not impact authors who deleted an article that was never made live.<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lance Winslow</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/deleted-articles-now-used-to-compare.html#comment-12529</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/deleted-articles-now-used-to-compare.html#comment-12529</guid>
					<description>It is great to be working with such a wonderful article website that has been around for so long. So many other article websites come and go. So in that case an author could waste their time there and find that one day the website is gone and all their articles vanish. What is interesting about this site is that we are worried about authors gaming the system and deleting articles, whereas with the other sites you have to worry that one day, POOF! They're gone, completely, like See Ya, Nada, Zilch, DOA, dust in the wind. I think I'll stay with EA, a proven source for online articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is great to be working with such a wonderful article website that has been around for so long. So many other article websites come and go. So in that case an author could waste their time there and find that one day the website is gone and all their articles vanish. What is interesting about this site is that we are worried about authors gaming the system and deleting articles, whereas with the other sites you have to worry that one day, POOF! They&#8217;re gone, completely, like See Ya, Nada, Zilch, DOA, dust in the wind. I think I&#8217;ll stay with EA, a proven source for online articles.<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lance Winslow</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/deleted-articles-now-used-to-compare.html#comment-12527</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 07:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/deleted-articles-now-used-to-compare.html#comment-12527</guid>
					<description>Wow, all this sounds like a lot of work, but if the system does it by itself, then that is a very good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, all this sounds like a lot of work, but if the system does it by itself, then that is a very good thing.<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Christina Sponias</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/deleted-articles-now-used-to-compare.html#comment-12524</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 23:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/deleted-articles-now-used-to-compare.html#comment-12524</guid>
					<description>I think that the Internet should have other laws. For example many people change their articles 20% to have them in their sites (without any link) and to submit them to several article directories and this is “ok”. This is why many bloggers simply copy what other people write and change the text a little bit, pretending they are the real authors… and this is not considered duplicated content.

This is why many “brilliant authors” change the same article a thousand times to generate more articles… and they do several tricks to game your system. 

Why is it permitted to change only 20% of any document and use it in other applications with only a few changes? 

Usually the thieves distort the articles they steal with a horrible synthesis and grammar. This is another indication that the content is stolen, but it is “ok”: it is not considered anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the Internet should have other laws. For example many people change their articles 20% to have them in their sites (without any link) and to submit them to several article directories and this is “ok”. This is why many bloggers simply copy what other people write and change the text a little bit, pretending they are the real authors… and this is not considered duplicated content.</p>
<p>This is why many “brilliant authors” change the same article a thousand times to generate more articles… and they do several tricks to game your system. </p>
<p>Why is it permitted to change only 20% of any document and use it in other applications with only a few changes? </p>
<p>Usually the thieves distort the articles they steal with a horrible synthesis and grammar. This is another indication that the content is stolen, but it is “ok”: it is not considered anything.<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jan Verhoeff</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/deleted-articles-now-used-to-compare.html#comment-12521</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/deleted-articles-now-used-to-compare.html#comment-12521</guid>
					<description>Hey! You commented almost before I posted... lol

That's some schnazzy resource you have there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey! You commented almost before I posted&#8230; lol</p>
<p>That&#8217;s some schnazzy resource you have there!<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Christopher M. Knight</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/deleted-articles-now-used-to-compare.html#comment-12518</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/deleted-articles-now-used-to-compare.html#comment-12518</guid>
					<description>Ahh schucks Jan:
http://janverhoeff.com/?p=47</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh schucks Jan:<br />
<a href='http://janverhoeff.com/?p=47' rel='nofollow'>http://janverhoeff.com/?p=47</a><br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Susan Scharfman</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/deleted-articles-now-used-to-compare.html#comment-12516</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/deleted-articles-now-used-to-compare.html#comment-12516</guid>
					<description>&quot;Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.&quot;

I can't believe how much you have to micro-manage. I don't know why I am always thrown back on my heels by people who deliberately attempt to deceive. You meet them every day, and yet &quot;you wanna believe.&quot;

 Good luck to Chris and team.  suschar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.&#8221;</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t believe how much you have to micro-manage. I don&#8217;t know why I am always thrown back on my heels by people who deliberately attempt to deceive. You meet them every day, and yet &#8220;you wanna believe.&#8221;</p>
<p> Good luck to Chris and team.  suschar<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jan Verhoeff</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/deleted-articles-now-used-to-compare.html#comment-12512</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/11/deleted-articles-now-used-to-compare.html#comment-12512</guid>
					<description>I rarely delete an article (unless it's been rejected for some reason and I agree with you - which has happened), but resubmitting an article I've deleted almost never happens. If I'm going to resubmit, I simply edit the article. But, even that seems unnecessary. If it was accepted originally, why not just submit another new article with the new information and leave the original article in tact?

I've 'tried' a lot of stuff on article marketing, some worked, some didn't. And my articles prove the service works. So I believe it's more beneficial to just keep writing... Nemo style, &quot;just keep writing, just keep writing.&quot;

I'm going to go write some more...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rarely delete an article (unless it&#8217;s been rejected for some reason and I agree with you - which has happened), but resubmitting an article I&#8217;ve deleted almost never happens. If I&#8217;m going to resubmit, I simply edit the article. But, even that seems unnecessary. If it was accepted originally, why not just submit another new article with the new information and leave the original article in tact?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve &#8216;tried&#8217; a lot of stuff on article marketing, some worked, some didn&#8217;t. And my articles prove the service works. So I believe it&#8217;s more beneficial to just keep writing&#8230; Nemo style, &#8220;just keep writing, just keep writing.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to go write some more&#8230;<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
