Comments on: Content Your Readers Have Not Seen Yet Is New To Them http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/08/content-your-readers-have-not-seen-yet-is-new-to-them.html Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:44:34 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 by: kelly http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/08/content-your-readers-have-not-seen-yet-is-new-to-them.html#comment-11305 Sun, 02 Sep 2007 03:18:28 +0000 http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/08/content-your-readers-have-not-seen-yet-is-new-to-them.html#comment-11305 I am so happy to hear that Dr. Reza! :) I am so happy to hear that Dr. Reza! :)

]]> by: Dr. Reza Rezazadeh http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/08/content-your-readers-have-not-seen-yet-is-new-to-them.html#comment-11301 Sat, 01 Sep 2007 21:05:01 +0000 http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/08/content-your-readers-have-not-seen-yet-is-new-to-them.html#comment-11301 I am pleased that as a result of my comlaint a search was made and found out that I had two accounts and the articles sent by me in one of the accounts were not read. Now everything was taken care of (quite rapidlt) and they are published. I think I owe an appology to the company and appreciate its prompt action to remedy the situation. I am pleased that as a result of my comlaint a search was made and found out that I had two accounts and the articles sent by me in one of the accounts were not read. Now everything was taken care of (quite rapidlt) and they are published. I think I owe an appology to the company and appreciate its prompt action to remedy the situation.

]]> by: Kelly Piet http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/08/content-your-readers-have-not-seen-yet-is-new-to-them.html#comment-11284 Sat, 01 Sep 2007 03:40:59 +0000 http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/08/content-your-readers-have-not-seen-yet-is-new-to-them.html#comment-11284 @Marte (above) I had my first article here rejected. The reason? I never wrote one before (well, not an online article for any submission). I accidentally put my keyphrase in the entire article WAY too much. Ezinearticles.com nicely rejected it WITH correction...they pointed out what was wrong. I fixed what they asked. Easy-peasy. I thought that was so gracious of them (they even offered, "hey, any questions? ask us for help, no problem" type of thingie). Terrific company here. So, if on some off-chance you ever did get rejected here, it's so well-done...it's like a sweet teacher calling you over and saying, "Now, Marte, this is really too much...why don't you try this?" Cheers! Kelly @Marte (above)

I had my first article here rejected.

The reason?

I never wrote one before (well, not an online article for any submission).

I accidentally put my keyphrase in the entire article WAY too much.

Ezinearticles.com nicely rejected it WITH correction…they pointed out what was wrong.

I fixed what they asked.

Easy-peasy.

I thought that was so gracious of them (they even offered, “hey, any questions? ask us for help, no problem” type of thingie).

Terrific company here.

So, if on some off-chance you ever did get rejected here, it’s so well-done…it’s like a sweet teacher calling you over and saying, “Now, Marte, this is really too much…why don’t you try this?”

Cheers!

Kelly

]]> by: Christopher M. Knight http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/08/content-your-readers-have-not-seen-yet-is-new-to-them.html#comment-11209 Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:54:07 +0000 http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/08/content-your-readers-have-not-seen-yet-is-new-to-them.html#comment-11209 Marte, I wasn't really thinking about regurgitating old content, but rather repurposing old content not syndicated before... or content sent to an email newsletter audience that has yet to be published on the web. Viewers surge to new articles but continue to flow to old articles. Your traffic snowball over the years will thank your OLD articles for keeping the ball rolling while your new articles give the traffic snowball a push with each one added to the size of your snowball. The more you build up your article inventory, the larger your traffic snowball. As for the published scholar... two of our editors messed up and it's been corrected. Marte,

I wasn’t really thinking about regurgitating old content, but rather repurposing old content not syndicated before… or content sent to an email newsletter audience that has yet to be published on the web.

Viewers surge to new articles but continue to flow to old articles. Your traffic snowball over the years will thank your OLD articles for keeping the ball rolling while your new articles give the traffic snowball a push with each one added to the size of your snowball. The more you build up your article inventory, the larger your traffic snowball.

As for the published scholar… two of our editors messed up and it’s been corrected.

]]> by: Marte Cliff http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/08/content-your-readers-have-not-seen-yet-is-new-to-them.html#comment-11197 Tue, 28 Aug 2007 23:44:52 +0000 http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/08/content-your-readers-have-not-seen-yet-is-new-to-them.html#comment-11197 So Christopher, How do you think an article should be before it's time to revamp the same idea and send it out again? I think it's a great idea but don't want to be redundant. Do viewers go back and look at articles that are a couple of years old, or do most just read the newer things? I found the comments from the "published scholar" interesting. Never having had an article rejected, I don't know what would cause you to reject one, but I wonder if he doesn't need to write in a less "scholarly" fashion in order to appeal to the general reading public. So Christopher,
How do you think an article should be before it’s time to revamp the same idea and send it out again? I think it’s a great idea but don’t want to be redundant.

Do viewers go back and look at articles that are a couple of years old, or do most just read the newer things?

I found the comments from the “published scholar” interesting. Never having had an article rejected, I don’t know what would cause you to reject one, but I wonder if he doesn’t need to write in a less “scholarly” fashion in order to appeal to the general reading public.

]]> by: Christopher M. Knight http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/08/content-your-readers-have-not-seen-yet-is-new-to-them.html#comment-11178 Tue, 28 Aug 2007 06:42:14 +0000 http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/08/content-your-readers-have-not-seen-yet-is-new-to-them.html#comment-11178 Dr. Rezazadeh, I've responded to you privately and hopefully resolved the issue to your satisfaction. Dr. Rezazadeh,

I’ve responded to you privately and hopefully resolved the issue to your satisfaction.

]]> by: Kammie http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/08/content-your-readers-have-not-seen-yet-is-new-to-them.html#comment-11148 Sat, 25 Aug 2007 21:22:27 +0000 http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/08/content-your-readers-have-not-seen-yet-is-new-to-them.html#comment-11148 Chris...great advice as always!! You've got me itching to dig into my blog archives and re-purpose my past "how to" posts as articles...just a little nip and tuck and I've got new content...just like that! Thanks again, Kammie K. Chris…great advice as always!!

You’ve got me itching to dig into my blog archives and re-purpose my past “how to” posts as articles…just a little nip and tuck and I’ve got new content…just like that!

Thanks again,
Kammie K.

]]> by: Christina Sponias http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/08/content-your-readers-have-not-seen-yet-is-new-to-them.html#comment-11145 Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:36:41 +0000 http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/08/content-your-readers-have-not-seen-yet-is-new-to-them.html#comment-11145 Hi Chris! It’s a very good idea to use old material in new articles. Old texts are very well known, so we can easily develop their content. Sometimes it’s boring for us to rewrite something we know very well and about which we already wrote too much, but what matters is that for the readers this content is new. Even when we repeat the same things, we can explain them much better, focusing in different angles. For the readers that ignore everything, this information is precious. Hi Chris!

It’s a very good idea to use old material in new articles.
Old texts are very well known, so we can easily develop their content.

Sometimes it’s boring for us to rewrite something we know very well and about which we already wrote too much, but what matters is that for the readers this content is new.
Even when we repeat the same things, we can explain them much better, focusing in different angles.
For the readers that ignore everything, this information is precious.

]]> by: Jann Mirchandani http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/08/content-your-readers-have-not-seen-yet-is-new-to-them.html#comment-11144 Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:38:50 +0000 http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/08/content-your-readers-have-not-seen-yet-is-new-to-them.html#comment-11144 Good advice for me, but great advice for me to pass along to my clients. When I tell them to write as a way to promote their business they almost universally get glossy-eyed at the idea. This will make it a bit more palatable. Good advice for me, but great advice for me to pass along to my clients. When I tell them to write as a way to promote their business they almost universally get glossy-eyed at the idea. This will make it a bit more palatable.

]]> by: Diane Dutton http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/08/content-your-readers-have-not-seen-yet-is-new-to-them.html#comment-11143 Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:27:18 +0000 http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/08/content-your-readers-have-not-seen-yet-is-new-to-them.html#comment-11143 Chris, How many times have you starting writing a book? You have prompted me to go back through the materials that didn't make it into my book "A Woman's Ladder To Success" because it was managment material, too dry for the book but in small bites some very 'lessons learned in corporate America" type stuff. Any great pieces of wisdom will make good articles. Diane Dutton Chris,
How many times have you starting writing a book? You have prompted me to go back through the materials that didn’t make it into my book “A Woman’s Ladder To Success” because it was managment material, too dry for the book but in small bites some very ‘lessons learned in corporate America” type stuff. Any great pieces of wisdom will make good articles.

Diane Dutton

]]>