<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Convert Article Parts To Stand Alone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/05/convert-article-parts-to-stand-alone.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/05/convert-article-parts-to-stand-alone.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:49:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tayo Solagbade</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/05/convert-article-parts-to-stand-alone.html#comment-28284</link>
		<dc:creator>Tayo Solagbade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/05/convert-article-parts-to-stand-alone.html#comment-28284</guid>
		<description>Thanks to &quot;Vanessa&quot; of  for sending me to this blog. All I had to do to understand what correction to make to my &quot;part 2&quot; article became obvious from reading through the post by Chris - and others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to &#8220;Vanessa&#8221; of  for sending me to this blog. All I had to do to understand what correction to make to my &#8220;part 2&#8243; article became obvious from reading through the post by Chris &#8211; and others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/05/convert-article-parts-to-stand-alone.html#comment-26983</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/05/convert-article-parts-to-stand-alone.html#comment-26983</guid>
		<description>Julie,

You will always have better success with several smaller articles vs. one big one. You are correct, the articles should stand alone. For more tips on that topic, check out this blog post: http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2009/07/cut-up-your-long-articles.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julie,</p>
<p>You will always have better success with several smaller articles vs. one big one. You are correct, the articles should stand alone. For more tips on that topic, check out this blog post: <a href="http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2009/07/cut-up-your-long-articles.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2009/07/cut-up-your-long-articles.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher M. Knight</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/05/convert-article-parts-to-stand-alone.html#comment-26982</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher M. Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/05/convert-article-parts-to-stand-alone.html#comment-26982</guid>
		<description>1800 words may be a lost traffic crime... :-)

(3) 600 high value articles will ALWAYS out-perform (1) 1800 word article in terms of traffic attraction.

If you want to feel better, split the difference and make it (2) 900 word articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1800 words may be a lost traffic crime&#8230; :-)</p>
<p>(3) 600 high value articles will ALWAYS out-perform (1) 1800 word article in terms of traffic attraction.</p>
<p>If you want to feel better, split the difference and make it (2) 900 word articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Jones</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/05/convert-article-parts-to-stand-alone.html#comment-26979</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/05/convert-article-parts-to-stand-alone.html#comment-26979</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m knew to article writing and have been advised to keep articles to about 400 words if at all possible. I&#039;ve created one that ended up at about 1800 words and it turned out well. Then I stumbled across a guide tutorial somewhere that said if you have an article this long, you should consider breaking it in two, the advantage being, in effect, giving you two instead of one. Nothing was mentioned about how they should stand alone in content though. I did go to the trouble of breaking it down into two parts but they the first is obviously related to the second although the content in each deals with different aspects. Classic confusion over different views! Do you think 1800 words is too long? I&#039;d rather keep it as one if you think that is the best approach to having the article picked up by publishers. Thanks very much for this discussion. It is very helpful. Regards, Julie Jones</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m knew to article writing and have been advised to keep articles to about 400 words if at all possible. I&#8217;ve created one that ended up at about 1800 words and it turned out well. Then I stumbled across a guide tutorial somewhere that said if you have an article this long, you should consider breaking it in two, the advantage being, in effect, giving you two instead of one. Nothing was mentioned about how they should stand alone in content though. I did go to the trouble of breaking it down into two parts but they the first is obviously related to the second although the content in each deals with different aspects. Classic confusion over different views! Do you think 1800 words is too long? I&#8217;d rather keep it as one if you think that is the best approach to having the article picked up by publishers. Thanks very much for this discussion. It is very helpful. Regards, Julie Jones</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Best</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/05/convert-article-parts-to-stand-alone.html#comment-13238</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Best</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/05/convert-article-parts-to-stand-alone.html#comment-13238</guid>
		<description>I guess I should have used spellchecker,  here&#039;s the missing     r

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I should have used spellchecker,  here&#8217;s the missing     r</p>
<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Best</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/05/convert-article-parts-to-stand-alone.html#comment-13237</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Best</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/05/convert-article-parts-to-stand-alone.html#comment-13237</guid>
		<description>Chris,  Thank you 

I had searched the site for information just such as this, when I gave up in desperation.  Casey emailed me the link to this post

I have been concerned of late on how actually to complete and tile an up coming article series.  Again, thanks for you help</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,  Thank you </p>
<p>I had searched the site for information just such as this, when I gave up in desperation.  Casey emailed me the link to this post</p>
<p>I have been concerned of late on how actually to complete and tile an up coming article series.  Again, thanks for you help</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aldian Prakoso</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/05/convert-article-parts-to-stand-alone.html#comment-9999</link>
		<dc:creator>Aldian Prakoso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 09:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/05/convert-article-parts-to-stand-alone.html#comment-9999</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tip Chris.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip Chris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina Sponias</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/05/convert-article-parts-to-stand-alone.html#comment-9956</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina Sponias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 10:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/05/convert-article-parts-to-stand-alone.html#comment-9956</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris! I think your advice is essential. I wanted to write many articles about the same subject because you canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t say too much in a short article, but besides understanding that my readers wouldnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t be able to follow them, I understood that I could better share the series of articles I wanted to write in different articles with different tittles, focusing different points, even though IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m talking about the same subject. I think most readers prefer different articles too, instead of following a series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris! I think your advice is essential. I wanted to write many articles about the same subject because you canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t say too much in a short article, but besides understanding that my readers wouldnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t be able to follow them, I understood that I could better share the series of articles I wanted to write in different articles with different tittles, focusing different points, even though IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m talking about the same subject. I think most readers prefer different articles too, instead of following a series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bud Coggins</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/05/convert-article-parts-to-stand-alone.html#comment-9903</link>
		<dc:creator>Bud Coggins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 17:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/05/convert-article-parts-to-stand-alone.html#comment-9903</guid>
		<description>Chris: I agree to keeping a full article intact. I have found the best way to use &quot;parts&quot; is in blogging. As you know, blog posts need to be shorter than articles. So, let&#039;s say you have a 5 part article then post it in your blog, one each day for 5 days. It&#039;s also a traffic builder. I still love to write articles...but blogging is a blast.
Coach Bud</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris: I agree to keeping a full article intact. I have found the best way to use &#8220;parts&#8221; is in blogging. As you know, blog posts need to be shorter than articles. So, let&#8217;s say you have a 5 part article then post it in your blog, one each day for 5 days. It&#8217;s also a traffic builder. I still love to write articles&#8230;but blogging is a blast.<br />
Coach Bud</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajkumar Kanagasingam</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/05/convert-article-parts-to-stand-alone.html#comment-9881</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajkumar Kanagasingam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 15:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2007/05/convert-article-parts-to-stand-alone.html#comment-9881</guid>
		<description>If you are writing a non-fiction book, divide the content into various stand-alone articles and connect your book title as the main title and the each divided contents into related sub-titles.

See the exposure you are getting for the book.

If you are not clear of my strategy just click my name above, you will understand how I have done it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are writing a non-fiction book, divide the content into various stand-alone articles and connect your book title as the main title and the each divided contents into related sub-titles.</p>
<p>See the exposure you are getting for the book.</p>
<p>If you are not clear of my strategy just click my name above, you will understand how I have done it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
