<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Only 3 URLs?</title>
	<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/why-only-3-urls.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jennifer Carter</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/why-only-3-urls.html#comment-2333</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/why-only-3-urls.html#comment-2333</guid>
					<description>I agree with Marco - I often want to.. refer readers to find out further information from my sites about a particular subject; but also want to get them looking at other related content too.

For example, people looking to build traffic to their websites might also be interested in making more money from them too - that's not too unrealistic to expect - so in this case, I would include links to both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Marco - I often want to.. refer readers to find out further information from my sites about a particular subject; but also want to get them looking at other related content too.</p>
<p>For example, people looking to build traffic to their websites might also be interested in making more money from them too - that&#8217;s not too unrealistic to expect - so in this case, I would include links to both.<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Telefon Mann</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/why-only-3-urls.html#comment-1543</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 May 2006 13:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/why-only-3-urls.html#comment-1543</guid>
					<description>I think only one link is more than enough to explain something and its preventing from massive comment-spamming</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think only one link is more than enough to explain something and its preventing from massive comment-spamming<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marco Terry</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/why-only-3-urls.html#comment-1334</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 19:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/why-only-3-urls.html#comment-1334</guid>
					<description>Actually, I like having three links. Many of my articles cover two or three related related subjects, and having multiple links allows me to direct traffic to the right area of my site.

Why two or three related subjects per article? Well, I write about commercial finance and usually like to provide two to three approaches (e.g. a/r financing, purchase order financing and LOC's..... they are all very related but different).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I like having three links. Many of my articles cover two or three related related subjects, and having multiple links allows me to direct traffic to the right area of my site.</p>
<p>Why two or three related subjects per article? Well, I write about commercial finance and usually like to provide two to three approaches (e.g. a/r financing, purchase order financing and LOC&#8217;s&#8230;.. they are all very related but different).<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris Knight</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/why-only-3-urls.html#comment-1333</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 15:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/why-only-3-urls.html#comment-1333</guid>
					<description>Patsi, it's 3 self serving URL's in the entire article including the BODY and the RESOURCE BOX. The ideal when citing resources that are not self serving is to not do it at all. This is not blogging. This is writing for personal exposure. If you want to 'give' more to your reader with helpful links, do it on your website instead of in a syndicated article. -- We've allowed others to refer to their own articles, but usually frown on this because it's a gray area...and we'd prefer to not see very author referring to other EzineArticles articles within each article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patsi, it&#8217;s 3 self serving URL&#8217;s in the entire article including the BODY and the RESOURCE BOX. The ideal when citing resources that are not self serving is to not do it at all. This is not blogging. This is writing for personal exposure. If you want to &#8216;give&#8217; more to your reader with helpful links, do it on your website instead of in a syndicated article. &#8212; We&#8217;ve allowed others to refer to their own articles, but usually frown on this because it&#8217;s a gray area&#8230;and we&#8217;d prefer to not see very author referring to other EzineArticles articles within each article.<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: adwin</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/why-only-3-urls.html#comment-1332</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 04:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/why-only-3-urls.html#comment-1332</guid>
					<description>Hi, personally I find one good URL is enough. I am sure if you got a good piece of article, you wont want your traffic to have a chance to get to diverted.

1 Targeted link is enough. 

Adwin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, personally I find one good URL is enough. I am sure if you got a good piece of article, you wont want your traffic to have a chance to get to diverted.</p>
<p>1 Targeted link is enough. </p>
<p>Adwin<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tony Wilton</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/why-only-3-urls.html#comment-1331</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 00:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/why-only-3-urls.html#comment-1331</guid>
					<description>I think 3 URLs in the resource box is plenty.

We are in the business of submitting articles...not blatant self promotion.

Tony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think 3 URLs in the resource box is plenty.</p>
<p>We are in the business of submitting articles&#8230;not blatant self promotion.</p>
<p>Tony<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ed Howes</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/why-only-3-urls.html#comment-1330</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 14:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/why-only-3-urls.html#comment-1330</guid>
					<description>I can't agree with Michael about one link in the resource box. I recently decided I;d be just as happy if folks came here to read my articles as my own site so I decided to recommend an author search at Ezine Articles. I was doing that before but not with a live link. I do this on the few other directories I support. Please don't make me choose just one. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t agree with Michael about one link in the resource box. I recently decided I;d be just as happy if folks came here to read my articles as my own site so I decided to recommend an author search at Ezine Articles. I was doing that before but not with a live link. I do this on the few other directories I support. Please don&#8217;t make me choose just one. :-)<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lance Winslow</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/why-only-3-urls.html#comment-1329</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 05:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/why-only-3-urls.html#comment-1329</guid>
					<description>This makes sense really. I actually agree with Michael. BTW Michael, wow, are you writing a lot of articles. And I must say I have been reading all your aviation articles; total 5-Star Articles. Great to read, awesome stuff, keep them coming. I second Ed's &quot;happy face&quot; too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This makes sense really. I actually agree with Michael. BTW Michael, wow, are you writing a lot of articles. And I must say I have been reading all your aviation articles; total 5-Star Articles. Great to read, awesome stuff, keep them coming. I second Ed&#8217;s &#8220;happy face&#8221; too.<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael Russell</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/why-only-3-urls.html#comment-1328</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 02:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/why-only-3-urls.html#comment-1328</guid>
					<description>In my opinion there should be only one link allowed in the resource area  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion there should be only one link allowed in the resource area  :-)<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ed Howes</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/why-only-3-urls.html#comment-1327</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 15:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/why-only-3-urls.html#comment-1327</guid>
					<description>:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:-)<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
