<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Audio To Articles</title>
	<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/audio-to-articles.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: reinkefj</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/audio-to-articles.html#comment-1348</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 00:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/audio-to-articles.html#comment-1348</guid>
					<description>About two years ago I pinched a never in my neck, after a couple of weeks of rest, treatment, and drugs, I was able to return to work. But my right hand for typing was useless; maybe good for five minutes. I got a copy of viavoice and was able to dictate as opposed to keyboard. It's fraught with difficulties but it MIGHT be worth considering. With training, I was able to get 99+% accuracy on dictation (speak directly to software) and transcription (record voice and pipe it into software). It's not for the timid or faint of heart but it can be done. The software will also read to you (i.e., as if you were blind) but it was a weird experience to be read to in your own voice. I did try to get this running for a doc who wanted to write a book and I am struggling with it. So to quote the knight in with the Holy Grail, &quot;Choose wisely!&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About two years ago I pinched a never in my neck, after a couple of weeks of rest, treatment, and drugs, I was able to return to work. But my right hand for typing was useless; maybe good for five minutes. I got a copy of viavoice and was able to dictate as opposed to keyboard. It&#8217;s fraught with difficulties but it MIGHT be worth considering. With training, I was able to get 99+% accuracy on dictation (speak directly to software) and transcription (record voice and pipe it into software). It&#8217;s not for the timid or faint of heart but it can be done. The software will also read to you (i.e., as if you were blind) but it was a weird experience to be read to in your own voice. I did try to get this running for a doc who wanted to write a book and I am struggling with it. So to quote the knight in with the Holy Grail, &#8220;Choose wisely!&#8221;.<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lance Winslow</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/audio-to-articles.html#comment-1302</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 21:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/audio-to-articles.html#comment-1302</guid>
					<description>I use audio or Speech to Text generally to help me write my articles. About half of each article is now done this way. And about 15% of my totaly articles have Audio Assist.

I have written much of my operations manuals for my company this way and I must say Dina is right, you can do it, but it takes a hell of a lot of editing to make it work, so in the end you may not be saving as much time as you think. But, it does improve efficiency once you get good at using it. Think on all this, I recommend using it as an assist to help you with typing if you are a slower typer. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use audio or Speech to Text generally to help me write my articles. About half of each article is now done this way. And about 15% of my totaly articles have Audio Assist.</p>
<p>I have written much of my operations manuals for my company this way and I must say Dina is right, you can do it, but it takes a hell of a lot of editing to make it work, so in the end you may not be saving as much time as you think. But, it does improve efficiency once you get good at using it. Think on all this, I recommend using it as an assist to help you with typing if you are a slower typer.<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bryan Thompson</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/audio-to-articles.html#comment-1301</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 21:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/audio-to-articles.html#comment-1301</guid>
					<description>I've used this method before for articles but have found that at least for myself, it is very ineffective.  In fact, all the articles that I wrote with this I ended up discarding or completely re-working.  I find it almost impossible to write good, persuasive content from speaking it and I suspect that many other people are the same way.  However, a very interesting idea that could work for some.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used this method before for articles but have found that at least for myself, it is very ineffective.  In fact, all the articles that I wrote with this I ended up discarding or completely re-working.  I find it almost impossible to write good, persuasive content from speaking it and I suspect that many other people are the same way.  However, a very interesting idea that could work for some.<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ed Howes</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/audio-to-articles.html#comment-1300</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/audio-to-articles.html#comment-1300</guid>
					<description>Man I love this dialog! Edward, your response is exciting to me. If you try this, please let us know the response you get. Dina, Thanks for sharing the book experience. We are a bit off the topic of the original post though. I;m not talking about saving any time at all. I'm talking about supplemental distribution and exclusive web site features to create traffic on the most progressive web sites. Speaking an article would be the same quality as slap dash written articles. If you have ever had your own work read to you by a friend, you will notice the lack of emphasis on critical points that were in your head when you wrote the piece. Here is the advantage of spending the time to read your own work. You know what it was meant to sound like out loud, and only you know.

Esmerelda, Thanks for the info that Aythor;s Den is already offering audio. It;s one more place Edward could try in addition to his own site for the purpose of comparison - directory vs homesite. I think yo should tell Author;s den what you just told us. You could get exactly what you want.

Cathy, Interviews are a great Idea. I have made up a few &quot;A Chat With Osama&quot; and &quot;A Chat with Saddam&quot; I had more fun writing them than anything else I've writte. It reall stimultes the imagination and the creative juices. Just imagine the interviews you would like to do and imagine the result. It;s a great writing device and I;m going to do more of it. Maybe a &quot;Chat With George Bush or Christopher Knight. :-) Now, using a close friend or someone on the same wavelength to play the role of the person interviewed would produce a whole different result than if the writer plays both parts. Do it both ways and pick the one you like best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man I love this dialog! Edward, your response is exciting to me. If you try this, please let us know the response you get. Dina, Thanks for sharing the book experience. We are a bit off the topic of the original post though. I;m not talking about saving any time at all. I&#8217;m talking about supplemental distribution and exclusive web site features to create traffic on the most progressive web sites. Speaking an article would be the same quality as slap dash written articles. If you have ever had your own work read to you by a friend, you will notice the lack of emphasis on critical points that were in your head when you wrote the piece. Here is the advantage of spending the time to read your own work. You know what it was meant to sound like out loud, and only you know.</p>
<p>Esmerelda, Thanks for the info that Aythor;s Den is already offering audio. It;s one more place Edward could try in addition to his own site for the purpose of comparison - directory vs homesite. I think yo should tell Author;s den what you just told us. You could get exactly what you want.</p>
<p>Cathy, Interviews are a great Idea. I have made up a few &#8220;A Chat With Osama&#8221; and &#8220;A Chat with Saddam&#8221; I had more fun writing them than anything else I&#8217;ve writte. It reall stimultes the imagination and the creative juices. Just imagine the interviews you would like to do and imagine the result. It;s a great writing device and I;m going to do more of it. Maybe a &#8220;Chat With George Bush or Christopher Knight. :-) Now, using a close friend or someone on the same wavelength to play the role of the person interviewed would produce a whole different result than if the writer plays both parts. Do it both ways and pick the one you like best.<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cathy Stucker</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/audio-to-articles.html#comment-1299</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 02:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/audio-to-articles.html#comment-1299</guid>
					<description>A related way to do this is to have someone interview you then transcribe the recording. You can use the Q&amp;#38;A format in the article, or edit the transcription into another format. When you respond to questions from someone else, it may take you into areas you would not have covered on your own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A related way to do this is to have someone interview you then transcribe the recording. You can use the Q&amp;A format in the article, or edit the transcription into another format. When you respond to questions from someone else, it may take you into areas you would not have covered on your own.<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Esmerelda Jones</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/audio-to-articles.html#comment-1298</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 01:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/audio-to-articles.html#comment-1298</guid>
					<description>Ed Howes and Edward Weiss said it: Ezine Articles needs to offer authors the choice of uploading audio articles (you can do this at Author's Den). I would also like a syndicated columnist link so readers could subscribe at my website thus receiving my Ezine Articles instantly (Idea Marketers has this feature). While Ezine Articles is the top place for writers, extra features would be welcomed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed Howes and Edward Weiss said it: Ezine Articles needs to offer authors the choice of uploading audio articles (you can do this at Author&#8217;s Den). I would also like a syndicated columnist link so readers could subscribe at my website thus receiving my Ezine Articles instantly (Idea Marketers has this feature). While Ezine Articles is the top place for writers, extra features would be welcomed.<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dina Giolitto</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/audio-to-articles.html#comment-1297</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 22:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/audio-to-articles.html#comment-1297</guid>
					<description>There is a publisher out there who is doing this very thing with books right now. 

I recently reviewed a book that was created from audio using over fifty quotes from various experts that were transcribed and incorporated into the text. I noticed immediately that the book seemed to completely lack the logical argument and natural progression that every *good* book has. Although the situation is slightly different because we're talking about articles in this case, I still see some parallels. To create a good solid chunk of audio that teaches something and seems cohesive and organized, you'd have to write it down first and then read it out loud, I would think. Being a visual more than auditory person, I have a lot of trouble imagining that anyone can just &quot;speak&quot; an article - but who knows, maybe it can be done? Don't public speakers typically start with notes; and if you're going to write notes, why not just send the NOTES and have THOSE made into articles, saving yourself the time of paying someone to listen to the audio and the challenge of the writer trying to weed out the best parts? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a publisher out there who is doing this very thing with books right now. </p>
<p>I recently reviewed a book that was created from audio using over fifty quotes from various experts that were transcribed and incorporated into the text. I noticed immediately that the book seemed to completely lack the logical argument and natural progression that every *good* book has. Although the situation is slightly different because we&#8217;re talking about articles in this case, I still see some parallels. To create a good solid chunk of audio that teaches something and seems cohesive and organized, you&#8217;d have to write it down first and then read it out loud, I would think. Being a visual more than auditory person, I have a lot of trouble imagining that anyone can just &#8220;speak&#8221; an article - but who knows, maybe it can be done? Don&#8217;t public speakers typically start with notes; and if you&#8217;re going to write notes, why not just send the NOTES and have THOSE made into articles, saving yourself the time of paying someone to listen to the audio and the challenge of the writer trying to weed out the best parts? :)<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Edward Weiss</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/audio-to-articles.html#comment-1296</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 18:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/audio-to-articles.html#comment-1296</guid>
					<description>Ed, your idea for an audio article directory is excellent! In fact, it's so good, I may do it for some of my articles. With most everyone owning an ipod nowadays, it would be eays to download small 1-3 MB audio articles. 

In fact, if I owned this site, I would include an audio section as well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed, your idea for an audio article directory is excellent! In fact, it&#8217;s so good, I may do it for some of my articles. With most everyone owning an ipod nowadays, it would be eays to download small 1-3 MB audio articles. </p>
<p>In fact, if I owned this site, I would include an audio section as well!<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ed Howes</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/audio-to-articles.html#comment-1295</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 18:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/audio-to-articles.html#comment-1295</guid>
					<description>This is interesting speculation. I would try it myself first. That is, do an audio recording with any convenient recorder on any subject of my choosing. I don't think I'd trust just any transcriber to find the articles in an hour of audio. The value I do see in the idea is that audio is excellent for stream-of-consciousness writing. The spoken word and written word are often quite different for most people. Our best public speakers usually write out what they want to say before giving their talk to make it concise, or hard hitting, or humorous and to make sure it complies with time restraints. I'm sure many speakers go through multiple written drafts before they give a presentation.

On the other hand, wouldn't an audio article directory be a great tool for those of us who would love to read our articles to the blind, the visually impaired, or people on the go? Audio indexes would allow one to pause and select from ant list of titles and authors in any category. Portable information. Load your Ipod and hit the road.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting speculation. I would try it myself first. That is, do an audio recording with any convenient recorder on any subject of my choosing. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d trust just any transcriber to find the articles in an hour of audio. The value I do see in the idea is that audio is excellent for stream-of-consciousness writing. The spoken word and written word are often quite different for most people. Our best public speakers usually write out what they want to say before giving their talk to make it concise, or hard hitting, or humorous and to make sure it complies with time restraints. I&#8217;m sure many speakers go through multiple written drafts before they give a presentation.</p>
<p>On the other hand, wouldn&#8217;t an audio article directory be a great tool for those of us who would love to read our articles to the blind, the visually impaired, or people on the go? Audio indexes would allow one to pause and select from ant list of titles and authors in any category. Portable information. Load your Ipod and hit the road.<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bernardo</title>
		<link>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/audio-to-articles.html#comment-1294</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.ezinearticles.com/2006/04/audio-to-articles.html#comment-1294</guid>
					<description>Who can do this service for me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who can do this service for me?<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
